RE: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale

I forget...

Is Free Cal-Tex Canon?

If so, doesn't this solve a certain amount of this discussion? ;)

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Brian
> Bilderback
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:25 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale
>
>
> >From: WJAL21@aol.com
>
> >Was in your constitution. But will it be in the NAC constitution?
>
> It can probably be assumed that any agreement that brought the US
> back into
> the NAC fold would have made some considerable concessions to the US
> constitution/history.  We're stubborn enough that, bad as things
> get, we'd
> probably prefer to go right along with our second civil war
> before we'd cave
> on certain issues.  Any history that does not take the US
> Constitution and
> culture and the will of Americans into consideration in the
> formation of the
> NAC isn't REALLY an NAC, it's a reborn British Empire inspired merely
to
> say, "Screw you, Yanks."
>
> Brian B2
>
> "The Irish are the only race of people on Earth for which
> psychoanalysis is
> of no use."
>
>				   - S. Freud
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>