Prev: Re: SG: Warzone & WH40K figs Next: Re: Grav tanks

Re: Manouverability of AIFVs

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:04:26 EST
Subject: Re: Manouverability of AIFVs

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:06:51 -0500 "Tomb" <kaladorn@fox.nstn.ca> writes:
<snip>
>Now, if you're building a self sustaining, self deploying peacekeeping
>force that needs to be fairly mine-aware, the LAV-III makes good 
>sense.
>If you're building a warfighting force where air mobility, rapid
>deployment, survivability (ie low profile) vs. conventional weapons, 
>and
>ability to be refitted with good armour is key, then it seems (at 
>least
>from the review I read) to not be a terribly good option. And it
>definitely seemed to lose in the "cross bad terrain" or "turn on a 
>dime"
>categories....
>
>Am I missing something? 
>
>Tomb. 
>
>
Marines don't buy Army.

Gracias,
Glenn/Triphibious@juno.com
This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
Historical - Warbeads@juno.com
Fantasy and 6mm - dwarf_warrior@juno.com

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:


Prev: Re: SG: Warzone & WH40K figs Next: Re: Grav tanks