Prev: Re: Walkers, was RE: grav Next: General walker stuff from the peanut gallery :o)

Re: Walkers

From: Donald Hosford <Hosford.Donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 02:41:59 -0500
Subject: Re: Walkers

True...

In that case, it would just be a tank with legs.  Probably able to climb
over terrain that would stop a tank...:-)

Donald Hosford

KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de wrote:

> Donald Hosford schrieb:
> > Actually the biggest "nail", is the fact that the walker
> > has only two legs.
>
> Which is why most sensible animals have more than 2 legs ;-)
>
> In fact, I think multi-legged walkers are a more viable proposition
> than two-legged ones. Especially if they can fold their legs to lie
> low.
>
> Greetings


Prev: Re: Walkers, was RE: grav Next: General walker stuff from the peanut gallery :o)