Prev: Re: Amour and Walkers was [Re: grav ] Next: Giant Robots

Re: Walkers, was RE: grav

From: Jaime Tiampo <fugu@s...>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:24:51 -0800
Subject: Re: Walkers, was RE: grav

John Atkinson wrote:
 
> I think Mr. Tuffley made it quite clear in his rules
> that oversized (ie >1) walkers are not part of the
> background or really even the core rules.  They are in
> there for battletech idiots who love Giant Robots[tm].
>  They were never intended to be balanced against tanks
> because Giant Robots are a lousy military idea.

I'm surprised you even bother playing Sci Fi at all. Perhaps sticking
with modern and historical games would better suit you.

Prev: Re: Amour and Walkers was [Re: grav ] Next: Giant Robots