Re: GEV Physics and GEVs for engineers
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: GEV Physics and GEVs for engineers
--- Thomas Barclay <kaladorn@fox.nstn.ca> wrote:
> I assume with mine pressure detectors that you
> set AT mines for a certain minimum pressure,
For pressure fuzes, yes.
> which probably makes them harder to sweep
> and less likely to go off on a jeep or false and
> go off on their own. If you crank this down, so
> you can target a GEV, then don't the mines
> become easier to sweep?
No, they become more dangerous to sweep--more likely
to blow up some poor sapper. AT mines are a breeze to
clear manually--if there are no AHDs on them.
> unlikely. Other options may present themselves
> (autonimous robot minesweepers, penetrating
> sensors combined with precision mine
> detonation systems, tractor/pressor beams (if
> you buy AG, why not?), etc).
Probably all would be better. A PLS-style system on
the back carrying a couple drones is almost ideal, as
your actual breacher is completely unmanned and hence
expendable.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.