Re: Field Manuals
From: "Z. Lakel" <zlakel@t...>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:06:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Field Manuals
oops, meant that to be offlist
From - Mon Oct 29 16:14:44 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.247.225])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA22931;
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:24:34 -0500
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with SMTP id
f9N2OUa84302;
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from owner-gzg-l)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 22 Oct
2001 19:24:23 -0700
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) id f9N2OMw84275
for gzg-l-outgoing; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:Rb1tevG6pQJohNe632LI5GLIwYIctimE@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.247.226] (may be forged))
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9N2OKE84269
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:24:20
-0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from tdcproxy.colesmyer.com.au (tdcproxy.colesmyer.com.au
[203.5.145.7])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9N2OAO65277
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:24:11 -0700
(PDT)
(envelope-from David.Tan@colesmyer.com.au)
Received: from smtpgw1.colesmyer.com.au (smtpgw1.colesmyer.com.au
[172.25.51.37])
by tdcproxy.colesmyer.com.au (Switch-2.0.2/Switch-2.0.2) with
ESMTP id f9N2O2h10507
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:24:02 +1000
(EST)
Received: from titania.colesmyer.com.au (titania.colesmyer.com.au
[172.22.51.28])
by smtpgw1.colesmyer.com.au (Switch-2.0.2/Switch-2.0.2) with
SMTP id f9N2O1f01840
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:24:01 +1000
(EST)
Received: from 172.25.51.35 by titania.colesmyer.com.au (InterScan
E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:23:58 +1000
Received: by triton.colesmyer.com.au with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21)
id <4YS66WA6>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:23:58 +1000
Message-ID:
<730387EF664ED51187F900508BDF252C65A94C@deimos.colesmyer.com.au>
From: David Tan <David.Tan@colesmyer.com.au>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: DS2:VTOL painting
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:23:53 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00004430
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1302
Lines: 41
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm currently painting up a flight of Future Wars Attack VTOLs. They are
done in a boring olive green with Vallejo khaki for drybrushing. I've
kept
the windows black. Does anyone og to the trouble of embellishing the
windows with gloss varnish or a few lines to give it that reflective
look?
Are there any other nifty techniqies I should know about? Also what
have
other painters done to their VTOLs (or aerospace fighters for that
matter)?
Thanks very much.
Dave Tan
--------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
This email and any attachments may contain privileged and
confidential information and are intended for the named
addressee only. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete this e-mail immediately.
Any confidentiality, privilege or copyright is not waived or
lost because this e-mail has been sent to you in error. It
is your responsibility to check this e-mail and any
attachments for viruses.
--------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary--
From - Mon Oct 29 16:14:42 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.247.225])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20924;
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:16:02 -0500
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with SMTP id
f9N2G0b84119;
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from owner-gzg-l)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 22 Oct
2001 19:15:57 -0700
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) id f9N2Fub84093
for gzg-l-outgoing; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:4MF15ZDfHdtYPi+5azLuhEXUHoox+JVB@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.247.226] (may be forged))
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9N2FtE84088
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:15:55
-0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU)
Received: from smtp006pub.verizon.net (smtp006pub.verizon.net
[206.46.170.185])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9N2FpO63948
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:15:51 -0700
(PDT)
(envelope-from erf2@gte.net)
Received: from gte.net (chcgil2-ar6-4-61-117-037.vz.dsl.gtei.net
[4.61.117.37])
by smtp006pub.verizon.net with ESMTP
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; id f9N2Fhv22695
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:15:44 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <3BD4D4F0.5000300@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:24:48 -0400
From: Ray Forsythe <erf2@gte.net>
Organization: Wombat Empire
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2)
Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: PA carried DFFGs?
References: <AB830B96F403D2119F880008C7247C510AF5A333@CTBMTY>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000442f
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1193
Lines: 38
Coming in a bit late, but while he RAFM HO scale Heavy Gear stuff is
OOP, the
1/285 line DP9 does now has weapon packs (p/n: DP9-242, DP9-243). I
think this
will work out about right for 25mm scale infantry, give or take a
little.
http://www.dp9.com/Products/covers/Dp9-242.gif
http://www.dp9.com/Products/covers/Dp9-243.gif
They've got two more weapon packs planned (DP9-256 and DP9-265).
--
Ray Forsythe
erf2@gte.net
Diamond, Ndege wrote:
> If what I'm remembering panzerfausts look like is correct, RAFM or who
ever
> had the license made a bits pack for Heavy Gear that had some
something that
> looked like panzerfausts onna stick in it. I think. Even if I have it
> straight this is probably not much help as the line is OOP...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eli Arndt [mailto:emu2020@wattosjunkyard.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 2:29 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: RE: PA carried DFFGs?
>
>
> Actually, you're right and it would be a bit more in keeping with the
themes
> of the PAs in Mak which use almost all laser weapons for direct fire.
>
> Now I need to find a source of 25/28mm panzerfausts.
>
> Anybody have any ideas?
>
> Eli
>
>