RE: [Not-so-OT] Insane figure painters
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:26:59 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: RE: [Not-so-OT] Insane figure painters
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 Beth.Fulton@csiro.au wrote:
> G'day,
>
> >FYI, I used the feminine because some
> >of Beth's work still has me shook.
>
> While freely admitting my sanity is in question and as much as I'd
love to
> wallow in the glory.... its actually easier than it looks to do little
> tricks like the Kangaroo on your ship. For instance your kangaroo is
little
> more than a smooth curve (back and head) and then a tick (legs). Same
with
> all the little details I paint, you find a simple way of producing
something
> that's close enough to fool the eye in to making the connection. I may
be
> insane, but I'm also fairly lazy ;)
Indeed. It's more a matter of suggestinga shape than actually painting
it. All my NAC troopers have a union jack on their shoulder. People get
very annoyed at that. Thing is, it's not actually painted _correctly_,
it's a bit simplified and looks LIKE a union jack enough not to warrant
further investigation ;)
Similar tricks apply to painting banners for 15mm french napoleonics
etc.
Cheers,
Derk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6
iD8DBQE7tAoxJXH58oo6ncURAjlPAKCW3rwyrN2xxb8FA70Jn7af2JfQ2wCgyGQ3
PDK84mxasRVrt+Uu00QVf6Y=
=LvlW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----