RE: [SG] Unit Cohesion
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:30:25 -0400
Subject: RE: [SG] Unit Cohesion
At 7:56 AM -0600 9/22/01, mrUseless wrote:
>
>(2) A more WYSIWYG approach, if you can see a model you can hit it,
with a
>few restrictions. Obviously, the viewpoint is from the firing mini's
>perspective (if in doubt we use a laser pointer held next to the firing
mini
>to determine what can be seen). This approach has the side effect of
>lessening the amount of cover on a table, since a model on top of a
hill is
>in the open instead of using the available hillcrest.
That is what In Position is for. The figures start to use the
available cover in that area to provide cover and concealment. You do
use In Position right?
--
- Ryan Montieth Gill DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -