Naval Engagements now was [DS] Why tank destroyers?
From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:32:24 -0400
Subject: Naval Engagements now was [DS] Why tank destroyers?
At 10:39 AM +0900 9/6/01, Edward Lipsett wrote:
>Have to check that out... thanks.
>In addition to who got the first missile in, though, the DD is spending
>a rather expensive missile to knock out one fishing boat equipped with
a
>few missiles and a few crew members. The dozen fishing boats only have
>to make one fairly small hole in the DD to take abig chunk out of South
>Korea's defensive capabilities.
If its a matter of destroying a FAC with 4 ASM's that will destroy
your DD (it takes about 1.5 Exocets to mission kill the average
combatant now) then use of two missiles to be assured of a kill of
that vessel is not a waste of time or money. Disabling the red force
launch platform before it disables yours is the important part of the
missiles on missiles theatre.
--
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill ---------- SW1025 H -
- Internet Technologies -- Data Center Manager (3N &10S) -
- ryan.gill@turner.com rmgill@mindspring.com -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill -
- I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL - \ Toronto, Gun down some squeegee kids, - NRA -
- www.rawa.org \ Then you can host the Olympics too! -