Re: ADFC, Vector, SMs and Fighters...

At 9:43 PM +0100 8/12/01, Ground Zero Games wrote:
>
>Sorry guys, I think I've stirred this up by not reading Aimee's initial
>question carefully enough before answering it	- in defence I would say
>that I was trying to deal with rather a lot of stuff at the time....
:-/

Nah, I stirred it up on our list in a polite manner. Others stirred 
it up previous in a more messy way.

>I've also been a bit behind on reading the mass of emails this weekend,
so
>didn't pick up on this thread until tonight.

You're supposed to sit on your computer night and day Jon! We need 
you to get one of those little pager-e-mail devices...That way you 
can keep in constant contact with the your adoring fans. :-)

Just kidding... :-P I've got one of those things and I'm scared to 
add that address to any lists at all.

>Laserlight is correct in what he says above - the answer I SHOULD have
>given is that if you're going to go to 3mu for SMs in vector (keeping
in
>mind that this is an option anyway, then anything else that relies on
>pre-ship-movement counter or model placement for it's effect should
also go
>to 3mu to keep it consistant. Thus Phalon PBs also go to 3mu, and
fighter
>attack range should as well. All the things that do NOT rely on
guessing
>the enemy's positioning should remain at 6mu, such as ADFC radius,
>Submunition pack range etc.

Achaa! Thank you.

>Hoping this makes more sense, and may clear up some of the arguments;
>unfortunately, unlike FASA, WoTC etc, I don't have a staff on hand to
deal
>with rules queries!!  ;-)

Actually you do. They are Beth, Oerjan, and others on this list.... :-)

--
- Ryan Montieth Gill		DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com  I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -