Re: [FT] WotW #11 Stealth Systems - Poll

I instinctively go for option B.
However, why not simply create two different systems
to fullfil each function?

They both sound very usefull
Thanks
Pat Connaughton
e-mail - ptconn@earthlink.net
ICQ # 2535086

"He who knows not how to dissemble knows not
how to reign"
Tiberius, Emperator and Princips of Rome

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 4:22 PM
Subject: [FT] WotW #11 Stealth Systems - Poll

> Well, I've decided to run a small poll:
> 
> We've proposed two distinct mechanics for handling stealth systems,
> which does everyone prefer:
> 
> Option A:
> 
> This is Noam's original proposal - The Stealth system reduces the size
> of the range bands of ships attacking it.
> 
> Option B:
> 
> This is based on Aaron's Holofield - the stealth system works like a
> screen against beams, and gives a -1 to hit against Pulse torpedos and
> K-guns.
> 
> So, which do you prefer? Votes please!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Charles
>