RE: [SG?] Cammo
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:49:55 -0400
Subject: RE: [SG?] Cammo
At 8:28 AM -0400 8/10/01, Bell, Brian K (Contractor) wrote:
>Convention holds a mu at about 1000km. Although some of us play it at
1/4
>light second (~70,000km).
Hmm, I was thinking about this further in the shower. If the beam
weapons are really just lasers then its an optical beam anyhow right?
Being able to get one on a target is just an exercise in optics, fire
control and aiming components then correct?
Well, a computer could be set up to watch specific portions of space,
by looking for abnormalities like glint, occluded stars and extra
objects, a defender could easily begin tracking bogeys only with
optical gear. No active emissions. Though they would have had to have
been there a while so as to be able to track most if not all objects
they'd be using as a comparative data base. Once the computer had a
hit, you'd have a crewman check it out with long range optical gear
attached to a fine res CCD sensor system.
Ships would be easily recognized based on outline and form unless
they take measures to make that more difficult. Now if Jon meant to
do this or not I'm not sure, but notice how most NAC vessels have a
similar outline? Basic optical camo just like the Germans used in
WWII. Scharnhorst identified as other ships because she looked like
the other ships, just a bit different in size...
--
- Ryan Montieth Gill DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -