Prev: Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required) Next: RE: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required)

Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required)

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:11:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required)

David Griffin wrote:

>A single fighter group does make a nifty PDS, but
>an expensive one. The problem against SM's is that
>you gave to guess which ship is going to be hit.

According to the published rules (FB1 p.6), the fighters only have to be

within 6mu of the missile salvo at the end of the fighters' secondary
move 
in order to engage the salvo. No need to guess.

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry


Prev: Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required) Next: RE: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required)