Re: NIFT Stealth II Trial AAR
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 20:13:14 EDT
Subject: Re: NIFT Stealth II Trial AAR
Not so much an argument as a thought to be evaluated.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:49:29 +0200 (CEST) Derk Groeneveld
<derk@cistron.nl> writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Laserlight wrote:
>
>>
>> Glenn said
>> > I thought the stealth benefits of the F117 make it a *Less*
>> aerodynamic
>> > design for flight? That's why it's nicknamed the Wobbling' Goblin
>> (Or
>> > some such) IIRC...
>>
>> The 117 is *extremely* aerodynamic, compared to eg a Der Theuerdank
>> NSL hull
>
>But is this a valid argument? The F117 is an aircraft turned stealth,
>and
>it's less aerodynamic than normal aircraft. Given the constraints of a
>spacecraft, does it take more effort to make a stealthed, aerodynamic
>spacecraft, than it does to make only stealthed or only aerodynamic
>spacecraft? Those are very different matters entirely?
>
>Cheers,
>
> Derk
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Made with pgp4pine
>
>iD8DBQE7SMDjJXH58oo6ncURApBQAKDu1ZzHCWEezwQQ2Ah6Zq+jM5BV6ACfYMJe
>ukgZZ7kTMJn9lu0BExhPwoE=
>=BfOz
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.