Re: NIFT Stealth II Trial AAR

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:44:57 +1000 "Alan and Carmel Brain"
<aebrain@austarmetro.com.au> writes:
>From: "Charles Taylor" <charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk>
>> 
>> I agree, and a similar methodology could be applied to aerodynamic 
>hulls.
>> Hmm..  what about combined Stealth/Aerodynamics?
>
>I've been thinking on exactly those lines.
>Should Stealth/Aerodynamics be the same, ie one implies the other?
>Or should you get a discount, so instead of paying 20% for stealth
>and another 20% for aerodynamics, you pay 30% for both? Or even 25%?
>

I thought the stealth benefits of the F117 make it a *Less* aerodynamic
design for flight?  That's why it's nicknamed the Wobbling' Goblin (Or
some such) IIRC...

Gracias,
Glenn/Triphibious
This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.