RE: Rules Clarifications (new FAQ?)

How about you submit official questions to me as I run Jon's web site
then I
could compile them all together say on a weekly or monthly basis and
pass
them to Jon or a nominee, after which I could post the responses to the
catalogue site for all.

What do you think Jon?

Paul Owen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of David Griffin
> Sent: 06 July 2001 13:12
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Rules Clarifications (new FAQ?)
>
>
> --- Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@juno.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:54:09 +0200 Oerjan Ohlson
> > <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com> writes:
> > >First off: What's a "FAC"?
> > >
> > >David Griffin wrote:
> > >
> > >>It seems to me that something like this could be
> > >>done by GZG a little at a time. We could come up
> > >>with a mark you could put on a message, like
> > >>[RI] for Request Interpretation. Someone could
> > >>compile them for Jon,
> > >
> > >You have just volunteered for the job. Good luck
> > :-)
> > >
>
> In order to cut down on the workload for Jon
> I think I mentioned that person would have
> to have some official standing and it would
> also be a good idea for that person to have
> access to Jon . Somehow I don't think anyone
> would be happy with my rulings, nor should
> they. GZG must have tournament judges.
>
> Barring all that, how about just a bigger, more
> complete FAQ handling some of the  more
> obvious rule holes?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>