Prev: Re: New IF ships Next: Re: [FT] New FAC? Was "New IF ships"

Re: [FT] New FAC? Was "New IF ships"

From: David Griffin <carbon_dragon@y...>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] New FAC? Was "New IF ships"


--- devans@uneb.edu wrote:
> 
> ***
> What do you think? Bad idea? Good idea? I'm not
> trying to make work for Jon, but there are places
> in the rules where there is a lot of room for
> disagreement (especially in the fragmented fighter
> rules).
> ***
> 
> I think it a poor idea.
> 
> The_Beast
> 

Direct and to the point, but not very helpful.
Why would a set of official rules interpretations
not be a valuable stopgap against the probable
long wait for FBIII or FTIII?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Prev: Re: New IF ships Next: Re: [FT] New FAC? Was "New IF ships"