Prev: RE: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out Next: RE: [SG2] New Rules Playtest Results

Re: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out

From: Andy Cowell <andy@c...>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:57:35 -0500
Subject: Re: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out

In message <20010705182724.9910.cpmta@c009.snv.cp.net>,
agoodall@canada.com wri
tes:
> On Thu, 05 July 2001, Andy Cowell wrote:
> 
> > Just my opinion, but I've always immediately placed the passengers
> > outside the vehicle with a suppression marker.  Never really thought
> > twice about it.
> 
> That's how I was taught. Maybe it's just a common sense thing, but I
honestly
>  thought that was in the rules until I couldn't find it written
specifically.
> 
> I use that ruling, but in the recent playtest there was a situation
where a p
> layer didn't want to abandon a disabled vehicle. It got me thinking
about whe
> ther or not it should be required for a disabled vehicle, or just for
destroy
> ed vehicles.

I didn't state it, but I only do it for destroyed vehicles.


Prev: RE: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out Next: RE: [SG2] New Rules Playtest Results