Prev: RE: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out Next: Re: New IF ships

Re: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out

From: Andy Cowell <andy@c...>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 11:05:30 -0500
Subject: Re: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out

In message <20010705155256.9824.cpmta@c009.snv.cp.net>,
agoodall@canada.com wri
tes:
> The only problem is that it violates the rule that a suppression
marker on a 
> vehicle or building doesn't allow the occupants to exit the vehicle or
buildi
> ng! (For buildings, the rules suggest putting the suppression marker
on one w
> all or side of the structure).

Just my opinion, but I've always immediately placed the passengers
outside the vehicle with a suppression marker.	Never really thought
twice about it.


Prev: RE: [SG2] Vehicle Bail Out Next: Re: New IF ships