RE: Questions re Fighters

At 8:51 PM -0400 6/27/01, Brian Bell wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>My reading was that Dogfights were different as you had to be in base
>to base contact. It allows the 1st fighter group with initiative to
>move into contact with another fighter group and declare a dogfight
>(If it was not that way, the fighter group that moves 1st could never
>force a dogfight). If that fighter group then moves away (primary or
>secondary movement), the 1st fighter group gets a free shot. It is a
>very good way of pinning an opposing fighter group in place.

I see that point, but its hard to decide. Since that does conflict 
with the part where fighter attacks are then handled.

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill		 ----------	      SW1025 H -
-   Internet Technologies  --  Data Center Manager (3N &10S)   -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			 rmgill@mindspring.com -
-		   www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL -	  The gunshow loophole isn't		 - NRA -
-	     keep federal laws out of private lives	       -