Prev: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules? Next: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?

Re: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks

From: "Don M" <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:24:59 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks

>David,
> Exactly right about the no consistency.
> of  Micromachines, there is none. Also
> My pet peeve with FASA ships and the
> background i.e. their books, is calling a
> ship a frigate that is larger then most others
> Battle Cruisers ( this happens a lot with their Klingons)
>
> Basically you can start with the task force and
> the FASA ships which are basically in scale to 
> each other about ABOUT 1/3900 (or 1/3800 or 1/3788
> or something). This is because they both have a
> constitution ship at the same size.
> 
> THEN you can branch out to the rawcliffe ships
> which are the same size as the FASA ships they
> mimic. Then there are bits and pieces -- Rawcliffe's
> Galaxy which isn't bad for scale. This Enterprise E
> which seems to me to be pretty close. 
>
> I talked Drew Bergstrom into making the Falcon Frigate
> and  he is now making fighters for the 3 major Star Trek 
> races. I would like to see a proper sized defiant done next,
> what do you think?
>


Prev: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules? Next: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?