Prev: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks Next: Re: [FT] Sensors and Sensibility

RE: [FT]Star Trek rules?

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:01:13 +0200
Subject: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules?

David Griffin wrote:

>Just a few more ships. These are just a few
>redone classics I did to try to get the ships closer
>to the Star Fleet Technical manual. I don't know
>if they're better, but they're more expensive.
>
>http://home.earthlink.net/~dwgriffin/classic.jpg

All OK <g>

>And my Babylon 5 UN and regular UN:
>
>http://home.earthlink.net/~dwgriffin/un.jpg

Poseidon CVN:
Listed as TMF 350, NPV 1582 (incl. fighters). 3 mass are unused; looks
like 
3 missing armour points. Again the armour is depicted as double-layer 
Phalon-style armour rather than the Human-style armour actually paid
for.

Avenger CV and Terrier CVL:
Armour depicted as Phalo. It shouldn't be.

Heavy Freighter:
Listed as TMF 122, NPV 210. The design shown on the SSD is TMF 128, NPV
228.

Heavy Tanker:
Design is illegal. A TMF 85 ship must have at least 9 hull boxes.

Majestic BC:
Listed as TMF 102, NPV 350. These values would be correct if the ADFC is

ripped out; the ship on the SSD has TMF 106, NPV 366.

Wright FF:
Listed as TMF 30, NPV 106. This is probably an erroneous copy from the 
Daring DH; the Wright as shown on the SSD is TMF 17, NPV 62.

Furies CE:
Legal design, but... with 20 PDSs, I'd probably want to be able to split

the fire to protect more than one friendly ship :-/

Sagittarius CH:
Listed as TMF 88, NPV 301. 4 Mass are unused; looks like 4 armour or
hull 
boxes. Also... should it be called a "missile cruiser" when it doesn't
have 
any missiles?

Omega CVB:
Listed as TMF 170, NPV 600 (I assume this includes fighters, since the 
costs of all the other carriers has so far). The design is legal, but
since 
the NPV *without* fighters is 596 the total NPV should be 716.

Hyperion CH:
Listed as TMF 115, NPV 401. Legal design, but the NPV without fighters
is 
399 (and with fighters it should be 459).

Nebula BB:
Listed as TMF 110, NPV 380. These values would be correct if the armour
is 
stripped off; the design on the SSD is TMF 116, NPV 398.

Searcher Exploration ship:
Listed as TMF 138, NPV 499. Uses 1 Mass too many; looks like a lab/cargo
hold.

Hope Hospital ship:
Listed as TMF 150, NPV 480. 11 Mass are unused; the design on the SSD is

only TMF 132, NPV 366.

Later,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."


Prev: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks Next: Re: [FT] Sensors and Sensibility