Prev: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules? Next: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?

Re: Mounted Cavalry (Dadada-dat-dada!)

From: "Don M" <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:18:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Mounted Cavalry (Dadada-dat-dada!)


>
> Some folks at the light infantry school are always thinking...
>
> Yea scary isn't it, I was in a light Division for four years they are
a
bit twisted!
>
> > Sounds neat!
>
>
>
>
> Yep! I'd like to see a crew served MG set. I'll probably convert one
> using a spare mortar team as the crew. Essentially an RFAC/1 on a
> tripod....
>
> Already have a bunch of the old Ralpartha Colonial pack horses for
their
> mountain guns..............oh no the last thing I need more evil
thoughts...
>
> There was a WWII Commando Captain (iirc) who carried a basket hilt
> claighmore in the cross channel raids he led. M1911 .45 and a
> claymore...  Ah the Celtic love of the charge ........never changes!
> >
>
> Why no integral GL?
>
> Thinking it over but the FM said not to use that type
because it's  bulk would interfere with mounted operations
remember the men will be whirring these acrosstheir chests
and it may strike the horse's neck at trot or gallop if too wide.

Prev: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules? Next: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?