Prev: RE: Size Class Escalation -- How high in Mass? Next: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?

RE: [FT]Star Trek rules?

From: David Griffin <carbon_dragon@y...>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: [FT]Star Trek rules?


--- Mike Stanczyk <stanczyk@pcisys.net> wrote:
> You shouldn't miss Dean's ST work on the Sci-Fi
> Cross overseries.  Good
> stuff.  He's also helped me with modeling ST:TNG
> ships too.  See:
> 
> http://www.pcisys.net/~stanczyk/new_trek2.jpg
>

Interesting. The Warbird seems well armed, but it's
hard to tell what class it's in without mass/points.
The Enterprise D seems underarmed.

My FT Star Trek DN is currently the Excelsior class
(about to be superceded by the Sovereign) and it 
is about 265 mass and has 5 type 4 beams and 4
pulse torpedoes. My Galaxy class has only 4 type
4 beams and lots of type 2 beams (and some torpedoes).

The Warbird is supposed to be physically larger than
the E-D, but not, I think, more powerful. I always
got the impression they needed at least 2 to defeat
the Enterprise-D. With the Sovereign, I suspect they
would need 3.

I play Federation ships ALL THE TIME in FT, though
my designs don't necessarily reflect any historical
or canon source. I'd be glad to show them to you
if you're interested. I've spec'd out ships from
all kinds of sources (FASA, SFB, Rawcliffe, and
others) based on their physical size.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail


Prev: RE: Size Class Escalation -- How high in Mass? Next: Re: [FT]Star Trek rules?