Re: Re: [FT] Scale in Full Thrust
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 19:07:40 +0200
Subject: Re: Re: [FT] Scale in Full Thrust
Ryan Gill wrote:
>>Have checked the figures now. According to TACOM the M1A2 is 69.5
short
>>tons, ie. 139,000 lbs or equivalently 63 metric tons.
>>
>>Now I'm no longer curious how you got 180,000 lbs, but I *am* curious
>>about the "80 tons" figure <g>
>
>It was after a quick search of the web. Looking further, GDLS says 69.4
>tons for the M1A2.
>[snip]
>And the Logistics people in the army say 69.54. So perhaps I miss wrote
in
>that one too....
>
>Could be a difference of wet and dry. How much does 40 rounds of 120mm
>sabot and all the fuel for that beast weigh in at.
69.5 tons is the combat load, so should include full tanks and full
magazines.
>Though I really think perhaps I mis-wrote that as well.
Then there are two of us :-)
Regards,
Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."