Prev: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: RE: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:43:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

On 13-Jun-01 at 13:40, devans@uneb.edu (devans@uneb.edu) wrote:
> 
> ***
> Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?
> ***
> 
> Discussion seems to be repeating, so my own answers are:
> 
> If you wish to play that way, and you can get someone else to, yes.
> 
> Should it be a printed optional rule in FBIII? Could be, but I can
think of
> things I'd prefer to take up the space.
> 
> Should it be a part of the main rule system? Definitely not. I'd
rather see
> the PDS capability of class 1's dropped, first. It was a kludge,
though an
> acceptable one, to begin with.

It lets small ships defend themselves from fighters.  I see it as
a necessity.

Prev: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: RE: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?