Re: MT Heavy Missiles and Ship Defenses
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:26:14 EDT
Subject: Re: MT Heavy Missiles and Ship Defenses
On Tue, 22 May 2001 04:40:47 -0700 (PDT) David Griffin
<carbon_dragon@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>--- Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@juno.com> wrote:
>> Except that FB1 divides it up into 60 degree arcs;
>> Yes, you can keep the
>> old Arcs which I would consider for MT missiles in
>> this case (provide you
>> own PSB as needed) for simplicity sake. 310 degrees
>> is one heck of an
>> acquisition area...
>>
>
>270 degrees and I agree. (75% of 360 = 270).
>And the only reason I'm keeping the old arcs
>here is that there is no later rule to decide
>what that 270 degrees converts into.
Duh! 360-60 = 300 (new arcs) and 360-90 = 270 (old Arcs) but how hod I
get 310???
Maybe I'm catching my father's Alzheimers?
Glenn/Triphibious
This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: