Prev: re: DS2/SG2 harmonization Next: Re: [FT] Savasku Pods (long)

Re: [FT] Savasku Pods

From: David Griffin <carbon_dragon@y...>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] Savasku Pods

I've done ships with class 5's, but the cost
for the big beams is so expensive, it seems
to balance. You get a few shots at the enemy's
expense, but it's hard to do it before they get
into range with their cheaper but more 
numerous weapons.

--- Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au> wrote:
> G'day,
> 
>  >We've seen large ships in our game designed with
>  >human technology and they don't seem to be
> unbalancing
>  >in the way that large custom Savasku are.
> 
> Just out of interest have the human ships involved
> ever sported one of 
> those class 6 or larger beams that are possible if
> you take the mass 
> progression thing on and up? I haven't had a chance
> to sit and down and see 
> whether the extra mass involved compensates more
> than the extra power 
> generator mass does in the SV, but it was just a
> thought. I'll try and have 
> a look over the weekend.
> 
> Beth
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> Elizabeth Fulton
> c/o CSIRO Division of Marine Research
> GPO Box 1538
> HOBART
> TASMANIA 7001
> AUSTRALIA
> Phone (03) 6232 5018 International +61 3 6232 5018
> Fax 03 6232 5053 International +61 3 6232 5053
> 
> email: beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices


Prev: re: DS2/SG2 harmonization Next: Re: [FT] Savasku Pods (long)