Re: No idea what I am doing. Help!
From: Andy Cowell <andy@c...>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:26:15 -0500
Subject: Re: No idea what I am doing. Help!
In message <20010424211020.6283.cpmta@c001.zsm.cp.net>,
agoodall@canada.com wri
tes:
>
> > 7) Since the rules say "taken as soon as required", and "For each
> > currently UNTREATED CASUALTY in unit"...when exactly do you add the
> > cumulative? eg: A low mission motivation squad of 6 men looses their
> > leader to gunfire. So far...you have a TL of 3 to test
against.....but
> > now as a cumulative you have the untreated casualty of the leader,
+1
> > TL? This doesn't make sense?
>
> Ah, this is unclear (and it should be in the FAQ, Andy!). It was
> mentioned on the list ages ago.
>
> The way everyone interprets this is that the TL for untreated
> casualties does not apply to figures that just BECAME
> casualties. You apply it for figures that were casualties from
> previous fire, not the current fire. The figures that just became
> casualties aren't "untreated", they are "newly wounded".
>
> The rules are unclear on this, but the consensus is that you only
> apply the "untreated" modifier for figures wounded from previous
> fire.
Hmmm, I missed out on this discussion. Why *wouldn't* you take these