RE: Fighters and Defense
From: David Griffin <carbon_dragon@y...>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Fighters and Defense
--- Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@pacbell.net>
wrote:
> >Because of the alternating nature of dogfights,
> >even interceptors seem to get obliterated by
> >normal fighters, especially if there is a 2:1
> >or better margin.
>
> Alternating? They move that way, but IIRC they don't
> fight that way!
>
> Schoon
I don't know what IIRC means, but the book
seems to indicate that fighter squadrons
alternate firing starting with the side that has
the initiative. Is this not correct?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.