Re: [SG] Scout units
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [SG] Scout units
--- Derk Groeneveld <derk@cistron.nl> wrote:
> - - isn't partial armour D6? I thought D8 was the
> full armour? I'm gonna
> check later.
Yes and Yes.
> - - I always thought you needed to be unencumbered
> by armour to get the 8"
> movement?
It says "Lightly equipped". Which to me always meant
"no armor, no heavy weapons" YMMV, it's not defined.
I certaintly wouldn't claim it for d8-armored troops.
> There's one thing which I find a bit of a shame;
> there is no advantage in > being lightly equipped,
with respect to being > detected by sensor rolls.
> One might make a case for lightly equipped troops
> being harder to pick up > on radar, making less
noise etc. On the other hand, > one could make a case
> for counter-detection equipment being in the bulkier
> armour, negating the > effect (chameleon layers etc
etc)
Depends on what sort of sensors you're using.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.