Prev: Re: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant) Next: Re: [FT] Needle Beam questions

Re: Re:[OT]Governments was: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant), etc etc etc...

From: "Mike J." <pmj6@y...>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:04:17 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Re:[OT]Governments was: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant), etc etc etc...


--- KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de wrote:
> 
> That may be nice as a daydream, but people living in
> such places as 
> Somalia or Afghanistan will tell you it's not going
> to happen. Either one 
> side will win or the fighting will go on forever,
> with more bystanders 
> than warriors killed or some third party will pick
> up the pieces, and that 
> third party will be even worse. 
> 
> If I have to choose between lawyers and gunslingers,
> give me lawyers 
> any time.
> 
> Greetings
> Karl Heinz

I could not agree more. 

Mike J.

=====
Visit 20th Century/Future Wargame Resource page
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/1966/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 


Prev: Re: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant) Next: Re: [FT] Needle Beam questions