RE: RE: RE: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant)
From: "Casquilho, Daniel" <Daniel.Casquilho@d...>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:37:20 -0800
Subject: RE: RE: RE: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant)
> No disagreement with any of that, and I agree the UN is like
> that now and more so when it has its own revenue stream and
> troops--but how likely is it that having "power without
> accountability" will make the UN a benevolent force?
Oh, I do not see the UNSC/UN as a "good guy" or benevolent
force at all. I just see them as another power players in a large
game. I agree with Jon when he said there is no "Good Guy" in his
future setting.