Re: [FT] UNSC

On 14 Mar 2001, at 17:37, Richard and Emily Bell wrote:

> The problem with the UN having better toys than the others is that
> the UN is funded by the member states and the FSE, NAC, and ESU
> control the permenent seats of the security council (a continuing
> sorepoint to the NSL). 

Isn't that assuming that the current permanet seats pass down to 
their political inheritors without any changes (UK and USA - NAC, 
China and Russia - ESU and France - FSE). Over two centuries and 
several major wars? I'd say that was highly unlikely.

If the security council still exists I would say that the four main 
powers would each have a permanent seat, the fifth permanent seat, if 
one exists, may be an appointee from within the UN itself.

	Steve

-- 
The Ground Zero Games Meta-FAQ is available at
http://steve.pugh.net/grunt/meta-faq.txt