Next: Re: FT-Needle beams

From: "Robert B Makowsky"<rmako@c...>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:08:53 GMT
Subject:

Rick,

Some good ideas.  That would have made quite a difference.  Then though
there
is the problem of moving up in the face of grenades.  Would we have been
willing
to keep momentum in the face of certain death?

Bob

    
>Beth Fulton wrote:
>> ...Three things.
>> 1) How do you think they could be improved?
>
>I was thinking that maybe they should have a multiplier, similar to
heavy
>weapons fire vs. armored vehicles. For example:
>
>Grenade impact vs. a figure in hard cover: d12 / 2
>Grenade impact vs. a figure in soft cover: d12
>Grenade impact vs. a figure in the open: d12 x 2
>Grenade impact vs. a figure in a building: d12 x 3
>
>-- Rick "Bulletproof" Rutherford :)
>
>
>
>


Next: Re: FT-Needle beams