Prev: Mail fixed? Re: Infantry Skimmer Next: Re: MT Missile Question

RE: [OT] Mini Pictures

From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:51:43 -0500
Subject: RE: [OT] Mini Pictures

Battletech also suffered from an in-game arms race. If you did not have
mechs with the lastest technology, you were MUCH less effective. 

One of the nice things about FT, so far, is that new systems are fairly
balanced with older systems. Thus the ship you had 2 years ago can still
compete with newer ships. And, thus far, you can still keep the weapons
ranges in your head (6, 12, or 9mu range bands [if you use the proposed
balancing option for Sa'Vasku). 

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Casquilho, Daniel [SMTP:Daniel.Casquilho@disney.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:02 AM
> To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject:	Re: [OT] Mini Pictures
> 
> 
[snip]

> I have seen many companies just rest on their "milk cows" and fail to 
> keep their products vital and fresh. Look at Battletech for an
example. 
> Good game, nice miniatures, loyal fan base, and stagnant growth. The 
> game has entered a down turn because of a failure to market and push 
> for growth. What was the last major change or major release for 
> Battletech? The clans? And how long ago was that?
> 
[snip]

Prev: Mail fixed? Re: Infantry Skimmer Next: Re: MT Missile Question