Prev: Re: FT-HET Laers Next: RE: FT-HET Lasers

RE: FT-HET Laers

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:36:43 +1100
Subject: RE: FT-HET Laers

Sounds to me like someone was buying 20,000 Cr hammers again...
It's not going to be pretty when the "missing" NSL cruisers turn up in
an
action...

Neath Southern Skies -http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/
[MKW2] Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu-Beta
[Firestorm] Battletech PBeM GM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard and Emily Bell [SMTP:rlbell@sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:24 AM
> 
> Mass: as per class 5 beam
> Arcs: as per class 5 beam
> Range: 36
> Damage: initial 8 dice (as beams, no rerolls), skips first row of
armor.
> Ships
> equipped with armor take an extra 4 dice.  Level one screens halve the
> number of
> dice, level two screens quarter it.  Screens only affect the number of
> dice, not
> the amount of damage determined by each die.
> 
> By unusual happenstance, the weapon was discovered by the NSL.  After
test
> firing
> a non-deployable prototype, they spent a conspicuous amount of effort
> failing to
> make a practical weapon out of it, and enumerated a great many reasons
why
> it
> would never be capable of fleet use.	Although, the funds could have
added
> two Von
> Teghetoff (sp?) SDN's to their battleline, and the project was
hopelessly
> penetrated by foreign intelligence services, they consider the
investment
> quite


Prev: Re: FT-HET Laers Next: RE: FT-HET Lasers