RE: [SG2] 2 questions
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:51:29 -0500
Subject: RE: [SG2] 2 questions
I had taken the phrase "irrespective of the Confidence test result" to
indicate that a Confidence Test was made even if voluntarily retreating.
-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://www.ftsr.org/sg2/
-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allan Goodall [SMTP:awg@sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:27 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [SG2] 2 questions
>
> >[Bri] This is bad (IMHO). I liked the solution proposed on the list
> earlier:
> >The defender makes a confidence check even if voluntarily withdrawing
> (this
> >is actually indicated on p.41 "Should the defender withdraw [he may
elect
> to
> >do so voluntarily if desired, irrespective of the Confidence test
> >result]..."). If if they fail, they loose confidence as normal.
>
> I do to. Of course some folks don't like house rules, depending on
what
> their
> players want. They prefer to avoid arguments by trying to keep things
> "clean".
>
> Allan Goodall awg@sympatico.ca
> Goodall's Grotto: http://www.vex.net/~agoodall