RE: Re:Armor
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:28:07 -0700
Subject: RE: Re:Armor
>2nd counter proposal:
[snippage]
>Armor is subject to threshold checks from DAMAGE (not EMP), but is at
one
>level lower than other systems (like core systems) because it is less
>subject to catestrophic failure. Each arc is treated seperatly for
threshold
>checks.
This is the only one that I don't agree on. I think that armor should
take thresholds just like everything else. KISS
Schoon