Prev: Re: Comments on pop Next: Re: FSE misnomer (what you call where you live)

RE: Re:Armor

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:28:07 -0700
Subject: RE: Re:Armor

>2nd counter proposal:

[snippage]

>Armor is subject to threshold checks from DAMAGE (not EMP), but is at
one
>level lower than other systems (like core systems) because it is less
>subject to catestrophic failure. Each arc is treated seperatly for
threshold
>checks.

This is the only one that I don't agree on. I think that armor should 
take thresholds just like everything else. KISS

Schoon

Prev: Re: Comments on pop Next: Re: FSE misnomer (what you call where you live)