RE: [FT] Varient fighter question

Oops. Correction:

Fighter vs. Fighter To-Hit Chart.
Fighter Type:	   Hvy	 Oth  (Unmodified rolls)
Std  (Multi-Role)   5+	  4+
Fast		    5+	  4+
Hvy		    5+	  4+
Interceptor	    4+	  3+ (2pt on roll of 5+, reroll on 6)
Attack		    6	  6  (kills 1 fighter no reroll)
Long Range	    5+	  4+
Torpedo 	    6	  6  (kills 1 fighter no reroll)

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://members.nbci.com/rlyehable/ft/	   
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bell, Brian K [SMTP:Brian_Bell@dscc.dla.mil]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 3:02 PM
> To:	'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'
> Subject:	RE: [FT] Varient fighter question
> 
> Fighter vs. Fighter To-Hit Chart.
> Fighter Type:      Hvy   Oth	
> Std  (Multi-Role)   5+    4+
> Fast		      5+    4+
> Hvy		      5+    4+
> Interceptor	      4+    3+ (2pt on roll of 5-6 + reroll)
> Attack	      6     6  (2pt beam damage + reroll)
> Long Range	      5+    4+
> Torpedo	      6     6  (2pt beam damage + reroll)
> 
> 
> -----
> Brian Bell
> bkb@beol.net
> http://members.nbci.com/rlyehable/ft/ > 
> > Level of Screens	    No effect	    1 DP    2 DP
> > None		    1, 2	    3, 4    5, 6
> > Level 1 Screen	    1, 2, 3	    4	    5, 6
> > Level 2 Screen	    1, 2, 3	    4, 5, 6 NA
> > 
> > So, does a similar effect count when interceptors engage heavy
fighters?
> > and can Attack or Torpedo fighters damage Heavy fighters at all?
> > 
> > As an alternative suggestion, it could be ruled that attack fighters
> > negate 1 level of screens on screened ships, and interceptors negate
the
> > Heavy fighter advantage. In both cases, the attack is then resonlved
as
> > if it were by a regular multirole fighter.
> > 
> > Any ideas, (perhaps an official ruling from GZG, hint, hint :-).
> > 
> > Charles.