Re: More Thrust Missiles

From:			aebrain@dynamite.com.au
To:			gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Date sent:		Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:58:06 GMT
Subject:		Re: More Thrust Missiles
Send reply to:		gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU

> Beth wrote:
> 
> >http://www.users.bigpond.com/derekfulton/
> 
> Nice one, Beth.
> 
> I do have a somewhat different proposal for MT missiles though. I
found
> Derek's proposal just a bit too complex. Of course that's very, very
much
> IMHO, others may differ etc etc
> 
> MT Missiles (the AEB version):
> * Move like fighters (including ability to burn additional endurance
to
> move 12" after ship moves) * Have an endurance of 2. * Have a speed of
> 24", like fighters. * Must attack the closest target within 6", if
there
> is one. * Are shot at like Fighters, Salvo Missiles etc. * Do 2D6
damage
> when hitting, non-penetrating.
> 
One question, if they are shot at like fighters/SML's, doesn't that 
make them incredibly fragile? Or do they take more than 1DP to 
remove?

Morgan Vening