Prev: Re: [FT] UNSC design Next: RE: UNSC fleet carrier design - still getting it wrong!

RE: UNSC fleet carrier design - still getting it wrong!

From: Charles Stanley Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 19:08:12 +0100
Subject: RE: UNSC fleet carrier design - still getting it wrong!

In message <d849a1014a.charles@charles.taylor.cableol.co.uk>
	  Charles Stanley Taylor <charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk> wrote:

> In message <70dd9d014a.charles@charles.taylor.cableol.co.uk>
>	    Charles Stanley Taylor <charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > UNSC Fleet Carrier	155gm	330 (approx)
> 
> Arrgh!!!!! that should be 310gm
>			     ^
> I calculated it right, hit the wrong key, then refered back to my now
> incorrect result!!!!
> 
> Well, its been a long day :-|
> 
> Charles
>

Oh!, and I got the name wrong as well, the Peackeeper has already been
designed by someone else, and is on the FT Ship Registry, I _should_
have called it a 'Constellation Class Heavy Carrier'.

Well, I think I'm having a bad week :-(

Charles

-- 

Prev: Re: [FT] UNSC design Next: RE: UNSC fleet carrier design - still getting it wrong!