RE: UNSC fleet carrier design

Jonathan Jarrad wrote:
> That sounds like quite a model.  Is there a picture available?

Yup,
http://www.warpfish.com/jhan/ft/gzgecc/gzgecc3/gallery/S3_Contest11.jpg
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Stanley Taylor [mailto:charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 2:03 PM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: RE: UNSC fleet carrier design
> 
> Well, have you seen the figure! (it is a) big, and b) noticably
modular,
> and I have a psychological limitation "must design ships to have
systems
> represented by features on the figures" - which is a pain) Frankly I
> agree that its a bit big, (other people seem to think 'the bigger the
> better') - at least FT doesn't give bonuses to hitting things because
> they're large :-)
> Actually, using the old MT sensor rules, it shoes up as a 'capital'
> class target - use the thrusters at full power & manouevre at thrust 5
> and see if the opponents thinks is an escort playing silly buggers
with
> a weasel system :-).
> 
> 'Fraid upon my self imposed limit of trying to 'model' this monster
> based on the figure, the number of fighter wings has to be a multiple
of
> 4, and those bay modules are too big to just be 2 flights each (each
> module has 12 sets of launch doors).

Dean Gundberg

Starship Combat News
The latest information on Space Games and Miniatures
http://star_ranger.homestead.com/
star_ranger@my-deja.com