Re: [FT] [OT?] Has anyone considered...

>I'm sorry, but 6 arcs that cover 180 degrees in the vertical is a
little
>too simplistic for my tastes, and the 8 or 12 that feel better, either
the
>8 to which you allude, and weapons out of ANY are optional, or 12, the
6 FB
>arcs, split top and bottom. Painful, no?

Yes and no. Remember that 3 arc weapons then have a "half sphere," 
and all arc weapons have a "full sphere," so it's not as restrictive 
as it may at first seem.

As most single arc weapons are mounted forward anyway, do you really 
need the added complexity  of more directions?

Schoon