Re: Sa'Vaksu poser from Newsgroups (attribution)
From: Kevin Walker <sage@b...>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 11:53:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Sa'Vaksu poser from Newsgroups (attribution)
on 8/6/00 15:46, Charles Stanley Taylor at charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk
wrote:
>>> Hmm... I quite like this one, as it 'makes sense' that there would
be a
>>> limit to how much power
>>> a weapon (especially a biological -based one) could channel.
>>> Using an analogy with human beam batteries, how about:
>>> Maximum Power MASS
>>> 16 2
>>> 32 4
>>> 48 8
>>> above this, every extra 16 points of capacity doubles the MASS
>>> COST is MASS x3
>>
>> I also rather like this idea. It would seem to eloquently deal with
the
>> problem.
>>
> Thanks - I think I'm on a roll today ;-)
> Although of course, its not my idea - I just statted it up a bit
> Tom McCarthy came up with the oringinal suggestion.
One little point. There's no real reason (unless you want to deal with
the
1 versus 2 items with threshold checks) to take one max48 over two max32
stingers under this system. Both sets would cost the same mass but the
max48 can only channel 75% that of the 2x max32 stingers. The max48
stinger
has no additional range over the max32 system.
Kevin Walker
sage@bresnanlink.net