Re: [FT] Battle report - Dreadplanet vs KV

Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
> 
> Stiltman wrote:
> 
> >>With thrust-6A they have several different options to set up their
[...]
> >>>I'd be more inclined to go with the K5 overall.  There's a lot of
> >>>different equations one can draw up here for mass to damage
> >>>ratios depending on whether the target's armored, not armored,
> >>>screened, not screened, etc...
> >
> >>Indeed. That's the main reason I collect FBx designs - to use them
> for
> >>weapon evaluation (aka "target practise" <G>). FWIW, of the designs
> >>currently in the archive, about 40% are more vulnerable to the K5
and
> >>the other 60% more vulnerable to the K3.
> >
> >If this isn't the same archive as the Registry, is there a URL where
I
> >might get hold of it? :)
> 
> There's no single URL for the entire archive . I spend far too much in
> front of the computer anyway, so I've refused to spend even more time
> creating and updating a web page :-/ I can't publish all of it anyway,
> because it includes a bunch of designs that I've been asked to control
> for competitions and similar. Many of the others are available on the
> web though; IIRC about 2/3 of the designs come from the following
> sites:
> 
> http://www.hicom.net/~teske/sfleet/ftfb.html
> http://members.xoom.com/gzg_l/ias/ias-ships.txt
> http://members.toast.net/chanfaunce/page3.html
> http://www.dirtside.freeserve.co.uk/hegaf/shipsrhn.htm
> http://www.iac.net/~crawford/hobbies/miniatures/full_thrust/index.html
> http://www.homestead.com/star_ranger/starranger.html
> (though many of these are conversions from other backgrounds)
> 
> http://www.bcpl.net/~indy/full-thrust/full-thrust.html
> (BTW, Indy, I'm *still* waiting for those updates to the FSE and UNSC
> fleet rosters ;-) )
[...]

Yep, yep, yep! This hasn't slipped my mind. Just down the queue while I
had to attend to other things (Rainier, et al)

I haven't forgotten!  :-)

Mk