Re: B5 and rotating sections
From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:05:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: B5 and rotating sections
On 10-Jul-00 at 06:18, Steve Pugh (steve@wickedweb.co.uk) wrote:
> > Back on the topic of B5 and its rotating sections. Why use bearings
at
> > all? Why not use magnetic repulsion to turn to rotating section?
>
> Conservation of momentum still applies. The other section of the
> station would still rotate in the opposite direction.
>
> For there to be a static section and a rotating section there must be
> NO forces (and that precludes your suggestion of using magnetic
> forces) at all between the two sections.
>
> Having no physical contact and starting the rotation by firing
> thrusters would work, but it would make getting from one section to
> the other slightly tricky. And having two unconnected sections is a
> hazard. If something collides with one section and pushes it onto the
> other...
As happened in the pilot maybe? That wasn't an impact, it was an
explosion, but it is the same idea.
Roger