Prev: Re: A Strange senerio Next: Re: S:AAB USS Saratoga specs

Re: going OT somewhat... (Re: S:AAB USS Saratoga specs)

From: Charles Stanley Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 18:54:19 +0100
Subject: Re: going OT somewhat... (Re: S:AAB USS Saratoga specs)

In message <39647197.81EDF34A@stsci.edu>
	  Indy <kochte@stsci.edu> wrote:

[snip]
> 
> I believe the Centauri did have artificial grav. Just that their
> tech level wasn't as far as the Minbari

I jusr remember (but memory like sieve!) someone quoting JMS as saying
Centauri didn't have artigrav.
OTOH their ship designs make a lot more sense if they _do_
> 
> > Narns OTOH fasten seatbelt before leaving orbit? - but their War
> > Cruisers appear to have a crew of 3 :-)
> 
> You only ever saw 3 crew. That doesn't in any way mean there
> weren't more. It just wasn't important to the story that he
> show more.
Actually a small in-joke (almost) with a friend of mine :-)
> 
> > White Stars have WN decks - but have ArtiGrav - can probably land as
> > well.
> 
> Ought to be able to, given their grav drive propulsion systems. THey
> are, at the very least, atmosphere capable.

Agree there. Have seen several SSDs for White Stars in FT/EFSB format -
can't remember seeing any sign of atmospheric capability on them though.
> 
> Mk
> 
Charles
-- 

Prev: Re: A Strange senerio Next: Re: S:AAB USS Saratoga specs