Prev: Re: FB2... hmmmm... Next: Re: COWS? was pre-measuring..

Sa'Vasku Carriers (was: RE: FB2... hmmmm...)

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:32:05 +1000
Subject: Sa'Vasku Carriers (was: RE: FB2... hmmmm...)

If you have the time, the Sa'Vasku are more efficient at fighter
than any other race.
It costs them 3 mass for the womb + 6 biomass for a squadron = 9 mass
fighter bay.

Say you want 10 squadrons of fighters and have the time, it only takes
mass (using 2 wombs) compared to 90 mass for other races.  It's also
in points, but you only get the one fighter type.

If necessary, the SDN can generate 6 or so squadrons, but ends up with
hull of a DD.

It all comes down to the situation; if the Sa'Vasku see a fighter horde
coming early enough, they can generate enough to offset the horde (at
cost of their hull mass).

Neath Southern Skies -
[mkw] Admiral Peter Rollins; Task Force Zulu
[DitD] Captain Puppilier

> -----Original Message-----
> From: []
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 5:02 AM
> Yeah.  Sa'Vasku might be able to get away with fighters after all if
> just piled on the extra hull... will have to do some tinkering and see
> well this works.  Could be that they might wind up being one of the
> fighter-intensive sides in there... and it could be that they'll suck,
> too.
> The mess I see is that, the more spare hull you reserve for fighters,
> slower your ships are going to be and the more expensive everything
> will get to move the things.	So in the end, it might cost you more
> the Sa'Vasku than it would for the others.

Prev: Re: FB2... hmmmm... Next: Re: COWS? was pre-measuring..