Prev: RE: (FT) Floating table Next: Re: [OFFICIAL] another related question (was: Re: Entry speeds)

Re: MT missiles

From: Indy <kochte@s...>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 09:28:55 -0400
Subject: Re: MT missiles

Aaron Teske wrote:
> 
> At 08:41 AM 5/12/00 -0400, Indy wrote:
> >So far in most of the cases we've had to float it
> >was due to a miscalculation of someone skirting the edge and trying
> >to swing back into the thick of things; we've never (so far) had the
> >situation where if we float things to allow an errant ship or two to
> >stay on the table that others would drop off. Hmmm. And only once did
> >I ever use an extra table to not float the main table, but that was
> >during Jerry Han's "Berserker" scenario at GZG-ECC earlier this year.
> 
> Indy is obviously forgetting the glorious NSL victory over the FSE
where
> the dogs' supercarrier tried to run away, but was chased down and
> destroyed. 

Did we use an extra table for that? I thought things were just
floated as 'normal'.

> Unfortunately, some of the FSE escorts managed to get away and
> provide thier lackeys in the UN with faked footage showing the FSE
escorts
> as UN escorts, resulting in the good officers of the NSL squadron
being
> improperly taken to trial for their actions....
> 
> <grin>

The UN was not happy about losing some of their ships.	;-)

Mk


Prev: RE: (FT) Floating table Next: Re: [OFFICIAL] another related question (was: Re: Entry speeds)